|
A Sign of the Times |
|
|
Sunday, 13 September 2009 12:13 |
|
From Paul Begala in the Huffington Post:

The sign said it all. It was not some last-minute message some meth addict scrawled in crayon on a scrap of cardboard. No, this sign was professionally printed. White block letters on a blue background, the four-word message was in all caps. Someone had to have thought this through. Someone wrote it, edited it, planned it, designed it, ordered it, paid for it. Someone approved it, printed it, distributed it. And then someone thought this was a message he or she wanted to convey to the world. Thank goodness someone had the courage to take a photo of it, and then Huffington Post had the guts to post it on its home page.
The sign made me nauseous, made me embarrassed, made me wonder if at long last there is no decency on the far right. The sign said:
"BURY OBAMACARE WITH KENNEDY"
Oh, I get it. Sen. Kennedy is dead, and these slugs want health care reform to be dead too. That is so clever.
Fourteen days after Edward Kennedy was laid to rest in the company of his fellow American heroes in Arlington, right-wing hate-mongers decided to use his burial to make a cheap point about their opposition to health care reform.
Read the entire article here. |
|
|
Obama hatred growing in state |
|
|
Sunday, 13 September 2009 13:42 |
|
From Al Cross in the Courier-Journal:
If there was any doubt that emotional hatred of President Obama has poisoned our political process, a Republican congressman proved it Wednesday night by yelling “You lie” during Obama's health care speech to Congress.
South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson's unprecedented outburst, which he blamed on emotion, landed him on Democrats' 2010 election target list. Maybe he should move to Kentucky, where hatred of Obama, and the ignorance, suspicion and fear that feed it, have been much in evidence this month.
First came the Daily Kos-Research 2000 poll that showed only about half of Kentuckians, 51 percent, said they believed that Obama was born in the United States. (The error margin was plus or minus 4 points.) “Not sure” ranked second, at 29 percent. Among Republicans, the main results were 30 percent yes, 36 percent no. If the poll had asked about Obama's religion, many would have said he is a Muslim.
Next, state and local school officials were too quick to offer alternatives to Obama's TV speech to students. Some even kept it out of classrooms altogether! Those included the superintendents in Paintsville and surrounding Johnson County, normally two of the state's best school districts. In Oldham County, also majority Republican, many students opted out. In Lexington, one parent organized what she called a “parent-authorized skip day” at a pizza parlor, telling a TV reporter, “We would rather be there so we can talk to our kids about what the country is doing.”
Those children seem likely to be misinformed; the woman made that remark even after the text of Obama's non-political remarks had been released in advance, and after the feds revised their suggested lesson plan to eliminate the suggestion that younger students write about how they “could help the President.” Obama-haters saw something sinister in that, though the first President Bush asked students to do likewise during a similar appearance in 1991, when he was running for re-election. Three years earlier, lame-duck President Reagan was overtly political in a speech to students, advocating tax cuts and the line-item veto.
The encouraging thing about this episode in Kentucky was that so many people wrote letters to newspapers defending Obama. In Johnson County, The Paintsville Herald published an editorial and a cartoon ridiculing the two superintendents.
Read the entire article here. |
|
Obama spoke. Nobody died. |
|
|
Wednesday, 09 September 2009 10:25 |
|
There was lots of reaction to President Obama's "controversial" address to school kids yesterday, most of it favorable. In fact, praise came from some surprising sources, like Newt Gingrich and Laura Bush.
Unlike similar talks to students given by Ronald Reagan (who pushed his tax cuts) and George Bush the First (who asked kids to write him with advice on helping him achieve his goals), President Obama's speech contained nary a hint of a political agenda, focusing entirely on hard work, perseverance, and personal responsibility.
You can read the entire address for yourself here.
We have heard no reports of mass conversions to communism or fascism, and as this blog entry from the Atlanta Journal Constituion reminds us, no fatalities occurred.
Now it's time to move on to the next trumped up, overblown, Fox News/AM radio-driven controversy. Good thing we don't have any real problems to worry about. |
|
|
Were You Really Paying Attention, Congressman Guthrie? |
|
|
Thursday, 10 September 2009 08:55 |
|
Within minutes of the completion of President Obama's historic address to Congress on health care, Second District Congressman Brett Guthrie had emailed his response to his constituents. And, not surprisingly, he was against it.
As I listened to the President’s speech, I was encouraged by his willingness to work together and optimistic of his acknowledgment that medical malpractice reform should be addressed.
However, the President continues to look towards a plan focused around a government-run health care system. Americans need specific solutions and I was disappointed I did not hear those laid out this evening.
We must continue to look towards sensible reforms and steer away from the public option that would force millions of Americans out of their current health care plan and continue to drive our deficit to record levels.
Was Congressman Guthrie really listening, as he claims? It seems doubtful to us.
Because if he had really been paying attention to the President, he would have heard a plan not "focused around a government-run health care system," but one in which a public option would be offered to those not already covered by private insurance. As the President said:
An additional step we can take to keep insurance companies honest is by making a not-for-profit public option available in the insurance exchange...It would only be an option for those who don't have insurance. No one would be forced to choose it, and it would not impact those of you who already have insurance. In fact, based on Congressional Budget Office estimates, we believe that less than 5 percent of Americans would sign up.
Did you catch those key points, Congressman? "Only for those who don't have insurance...less than 5 percent of Americans would sign up." Clearly not the "focus" of the broader plan.
If he had really been listening, the Congressman would have known that there was no talk of a plan that would "force millions of Americans out of their current health care plan." Instead he would have heard the President state repeatedly that if you're currently insured and happy with what you've got, you can keep it:
If you are among the hundreds of millions of Americans who already have health insurance through your job, or Medicare, or Medicaid, or the VA, nothing in this plan will require you or your employer to change the coverage or the doctor you have. Let me repeat this: Nothing in our plan requires you to change what you have.
And if he had truly been paying attention, Congressman Guthrie would know that the President's plan would not "continue to drive our deficit to record levels" because it would largely be paid for by finding savings within the existing wasteful system, and, most importantly:
I will not sign it if it adds one dime to the deficit, now or in the future, period. And to prove that I'm serious, there will be a provision in this plan that requires us to come forward with more spending cuts if the savings we promised don't materialize.
So if Congressman Guthrie was really listening to the President, it sure doesn't show in his response. It's almost as if the email was written before the speech was given. Or maybe it was written during the speech. Perhaps the Congressman was among the many Republican lawmakers who were rudely and disrespectfully tapping away at their Blackberries during the address.
At least he refrained from heckling the President, unlike South Carolina's Joe Wilson. In today's world of increasingly over-the-top Republican shenanigans, we're grateful for that much. |
|
Is This How Our Schools Teach Respect? |
|
|
Monday, 07 September 2009 13:06 |
|
We've just learned that Painted Stone Elementary will not be showing President Obama's Tuesday address to students in the classrooms. Apparently they're bowing to pressure from some parents threatening to keep their kids home rather than subject them to such "radical" ideas as staying in school and working hard.
Instead, students wishing to view the speech will need written permission to leave class and view the address in the library.
One local mom has written to let us know that she will be joining her kids at the school for lunch and will accompany them to the library to view the President's address. We think that's a fantastic idea and wanted to get the word out to any other parents who would like to do the same.
As this dedicated mom writes:
"I'm not looking to cause a big scene on Tuesday, but I'd love to have a rational response heard and shared by others in our community."
We couldn't agree more.
We don't know if Painted Stone is the only school taking this approach. But if you're a parent with children in a school that's also capitulating their authority to the radical fringe, we urge you to do what that school is unwilling to do: teach your kids to respect the office of the President of United States, even if you don't agree with that President's views. That's the very essence of democracy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 9 of 38 |
Paid for by the Shelby County Democratic Party, PO Box 1266, Shelbyville, KY 40065.
|
|
Kentucky Blogs
Other Links
|